I’m glad to see you are keeping the original wheels and drivetrain. I like to see pickups with the “big truck” wheels. I guess you do pay the price in terms of parts availability, but after doing it once you likely won’t ever wear anything out. In the 1990s I had a Studebaker 2R11 with similar wheels and big brakes it stopped surprisingly well. Lots of surface area on those brakes, though they would fade a little on long, curvy downhill runs.
I have been looking for a similar dual cylinder as well. Plans for my L-110 are close to yours – mostly stock with a few safety upgrades. I found some that might work but apparently didn't keep my notes. I’ll see if I can find them again.
One I do remember is something kind of unusual, but it should work. I am 99% going to use this CNC dual cylinder, so I’ll kind of explain the details behind it just to float the idea. Just adding to the list of options…
http://www.cncbrakes.com/mc.asp?grp=mc&subgrp=dcsb&series=717&subseries=You can find them here:
http://secure.chassisshop.com/partlist/6130/Basically they are two discrete masters with separate outputs for total separation of the front/rear circuits. Also, they can be side-mounted just like the original cylinder, so no bracket fab other than drilling one hole (looks like one of the existing holes can be used as is).
So the question is, if you went this way, which size would you use?
The original master cylinder on trucks up through the L-150 is 1.125” diameter for a surface area of pi*(1.125”/2)^2 = 0.994 square inches. For equal feel/movement at the brake pedal, each of the two separate cylinders should ideally have a surface area of half 0.994 square inches – so about 0.5 square inches.
So, going the opposite direction, 2*square root of (0.5”/pi) = 0.796” diameter. BTW, a faster way around is to divide the original diameter by the square root of 2, so 1.125”/1.414 = 0.796” diameter.
Either way 0.796” is just a shade over 3/4” or under 7/8”. Units are available in both sizes. Skipping the math, the dual 3/4" units is roughly equivalent to a single bore of 1-1/16” while the dual 7/8” unit is roughly equivalent to a single bore of 1-1/4”)
Another thing to consider is stroke which, along with total piston area, determines the total fluid displacement available to move the wheel cylinders. The dual 3/4” unit has a stroke of 1.4”, very close to 1-7/16” (or 1.4375”) of the stock cylinder. This would be fine for my L-110. However, your L-122 has larger rear wheel cylinders (1.125” vs. 1” on the L-110 – fronts are the same on both models at 1”). Larger wheel cylinders = more fluid required. The dual 7/8” unit has a stroke of 1.6”. That, plus the larger bore, would provide plenty of capacity and safety margin for the L-122.
Sorry for the long post…
Your truck is looking great. Should be a real pleasure to drive.