I will say this about the Veils on Nuns:
Before the Vatican II Council the trademark of Catholic nuns used to be their habit, consisting of flowing robes and veils that covered the entire body, leaving only the face and hands visible.
But the design of the habits of the many orders of nuns has varied over the ages. During various times in history it has been practices among some orders to have their nuns to also veil their faces. Today this tradition is very uncommon and only a few orders mandates this practice.
got this from this page:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/23168191@ ... 647382234/Here is an article that discusses Younger new "nuns" wearing veils:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-rel ... 8718/postsHow you read and take it is up to the person. My take is that it is a CHOICE that the Nuns make, but is not necessarily a choice for people who are forced to "convert". Still, it is a valid point to compare the two, but should have the caveat of choice or not. As for the article about the nurses, in this uncertain time, it might have been prudent to consider if all the proper requirements would be followed. Personally, I think they should have been allowed to go to work. But still, it is the individuals responsibility and perhaps their employers responsibility to insure compliance with the law.
Oh, and I find it interesting that the Judges who have found against the EO are all appointees of the past administration, Could they not have argued this before someone from and earlier administration? Just a thought. Peace all.