Golden Jubilee
Posts: 8946
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:45 pm
Location: Canada's left Coast
Re: Virtual Front Porch
manicmechanic wrote:Hey , what do you guys think about the oil pipe line and the mining of the oil sands ? Just saw the extent of the operation , pretty big . Searched the topic and didn't see anything .
I know this for sure, the is no common agreement on the Fort McMurray tar-sand oil extraction. Here in British Columbia I know there is very little support for the pipeline proposal that will bring oil to the West Coast and then onto ships for export. The oil tankers pass under the Iron Worker Memorial bridge, aka Second Narrows Bridge, through Burrard Inlet between Vancouver and North Vancouver under The Lions Gate Bridge into English Bay, past West Vancouver and their hundred million dollar homes and then on to the narrow and complicated route through the Gulf Islands. The Gulf Islands are mostly in Washington State and just south of Vancouver Island. An oil spill in anywhere along this route would be a disaster greater than the scale of the Alaska EXXON Valdez crash and spill was in 1989 in Prince William Sound. The environmental damage there in 1989 is still a situation and the locals say EXXON have never paid up for the clean-up. That is 29 years.
Many Canadians have asked the question, "Why do we not send this oil across Canada to the Atlantic Provinces since Canada imports oil for that area?" This subject is a regular news item.
I watch the Canadian CBC for national news and Global TV for the local spin. Outside of Alberta, where the Fort Mac oil originates, there is little support for the new pipeline with the public. The pipeline is a political balancing act for politicians. The majority of the public on the west side of the Rocky Mountains do not want the pipeline. Kinder Morgan is the company who is promoting the Alberta oil pipeline. The environmentalists point out the long history of this company having pipeline failures and how the company dealt with these oil spills. Response time and clean-up is so important. If this oil was going to a local refinery for our own consumption, the local support is very little beter. As it is, much of our refined product, for the Lower Mainland, like gasoline, comes to British Columbia from Washington State.
I am not a supporter of an additional pipeline. I think the risks are much too high.
I tend to keep my feelings on the "volatile" subject to myself. I am not out there on the protest line with the environmentalists. I think the risks are too high for the environment.
Our newly elected NDP provincial government has had to form a coalition with the Green Party to get the majority they need to for government in BC. The New Democratic Party was totally environmentally conscience at one time and we know where the Green Party stands on this oil thing. I doubt the leader of the Greens, Doctor Andrew J. Weaver, will support additional oil pipeline.
We have, like The USA lost so much manufacturing and the jobs that went with the manufacturing to "The East". Now we are shipping oil to that area to support what we have lost. I do not "get it."
Shipping our oil to a country that is environmentally conscious would be less offensive to many Canadians. Here north of the 49th we understand that there is only one atmosphere and one ocean tha we all share. My friend in Barbados says, "If I pi$$ in the ocean in Bridgetown, Barbados, the ocean will rice in Vancouver Harbour. ( figuratively speaking)